Another Missed Opportunity -- Superficial and Brief Contact with Coworkers in Shawver v. Kijakazi

We are back in Shawver v. Kijakazi looking at the limitations to superficial and brief contact with coworkers. We return to the district court decision in Misti Jo. S. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. for the residual functional capacity and occupations. In relevant part:

lift 20 pounds occasionally and 10 pounds frequently; stand/walk for up to 4 hours a day with ordinary breaks [...] The claimant is limited to simple, routine and repetitive tasks with occasional detailed work, only ordinary production requirement, and superficial and brief contact with coworkers and general public.

Resulting in: 

Routing Clerk, a Mail Routing Clerk, and a Marking Clerk.

We discussed the limitation to standing/walking for four hours yesterday. That exercise eroded routing clerk and mail clerk while eliminating marker. Vocational cross is a no quarter expedition, we seek to eliminate all jobs. The more common version of this genre of limitation is occasional contact or interaction with others. Superficial and brief is a separate classification having more to do with the quality of interaction, teamwork. 

Superficial and brief contact with others is not a vocationally relevant phrase. A person can have constant superficial and brief contact, nothing is in depth. Because it is conceivable and not classified by the data, the vocational witness gets carte blanche to pontificate. 

Routing clerk (222.687-022) is a shipping, receiving, and inventory clerks (SOC 43-5071) (shipping clerks) occupation. Shipping clerks have no or occasional contact with others in 0% of jobs according to the O*NET. A mere 1% do not coordinate or lead others. Dealing with external customers is "not important at all" in 4% of jobs. Never resolving conflict occurs in 16% of jobs. Working with a group or team is not important in 1% of jobs. 

Mail clerk (209.687-026) is a mail clerks and mail machine operators, except postal service (SOC 43-9051) (mail clerks) occupation. Mail clerks have no or occasional contact with others in 8% of jobs according to the O*NET. Coordinating or leading others is not important in 15% of jobs. Dealing with external customers is "not important at all" in 10% of jobs. Never resolving conflict occurs in 29% of jobs. Working with a group or team is not important in 0% of jobs. 

Marker (209.587-034) is a stockers and order fillers (SOC 53-7065) (stockers) occupation. Stockers have no or occasional contact with others in 4% of jobs according to the O*NET. Coordinating or leading others is not important in 6% of jobs. Dealing with external customers is "not important at all" in 6% of jobs. Never resolving conflict occurs in 29% of jobs. Working with a group or team is not important in 4% of jobs. 

In order to make this type and quality of evidence probative, we have to ask. 

    1. Is "contact with others (face-to-face, by telephone, or otherwise) in order to perform it" superficial and brief?

    2. Is "coordinate or lead others in accomplishing work activities in this job" superficial and brief?

    3. Is fairly important ability to "work with external customers or the public" superficial and brief?

    4. Is the encounter of "conflict situations" on the job superficial and brief?

    5. Is the ability to "work with others in a group or team" as fairly important superficial and brief?

It becomes a matter of extracting concessions from the witness. The follow up question is whether an occupation that required those five workplace requirements or expectations (BFOQ), would you agree that the work required more than superficial and brief contact with coworkers and the public?

When we allow a vocational witness to wax on about the existence of work without exploring the range of available data, we allow the witness and ALJ to take from our clients the benefits that were promised in the Social Security Act. We become a party to a breach of the social contract. 

Forge onward. 

___________________________

Suggested Citation:

Lawrence Rohlfing, Another Missed Opportunity -- Superficial and Brief Contact with Coworkers in Shawver v. Kijakazi, California Social Security Attorney (October 18, 2023)

https://californiasocialsecurityattorney.blogspot.com

The author has been AV-rated since 2000 and listed in Super Lawyers since 2008.