Tuesday, August 14, 2012

McLeod or Chaudhry -- the Duty to Develop

In the space of 9 months, I note that the Ninth Circuit has widened the gap in the panel determinations on the duty to develop the record on the question of a VA determination of disability. 

McLeod v. Astrue went through three iterations before becoming law of the Circuit.  The final decision sets out the facts of McCleod professing ignorance of whether he had a VA disability determination.  He had a lay representative before SSA, an attorney before the District Court, and Paul Eaglin in the Court of Appeals.  The Cour considered the presence of a lay representative the same as unrepresented in triggering a heightened duty to be "especially diligent" in developing the record.  In the final analysis, the ALJ had to do more to get the VA disability rating because of its probative impact on the SSA disability determination. 

Chaudhry v. Astrue found its way into the books on August 10, 2012.  Jeffrey Baird handled the case on appeal but not before the SSA.  Chaudhry testified that he received a 100% disaiblity rating from the VA.  The attorney reprenting Chaudhry argued to the ALJ that the claimant did in fact have a 100% disaiblity rating.  What the record did contain is a 30% headackes, 30% neck impairment, 20% back impairment, 30% depression, and 20% narcolepsy.  The VA increased the rating for depression to 50% as of 2006, well before the case went to hearing.  Don't add the numbers together, that isn't how the process works.  Suffice it to say that the ALJ added the numbers together using his understanding of the VA methodology instead of the correct methodology that would have added up to 100%.  Chaudhry argued through counsel that the ALJ should have gotten the final rating from the VA himself since the attorney at the hearing was wrong about the presence of the 100% finding in the file.  Two problems -- the final rating did not wind its way into the record and the person making the representation was an attorney. 

And that is the problem.  Everyone in the room knows that the ALJ blew it.  He added the numbers wrong and the rating really is 100%.  The question is whether the Court will place its stamp of approval on a decision that the public knows is palpably and unmistakeably wrong.  When the Court rushes in to affirm the wrong decision because what the ALJ did falls within the range of wrong but reasonable, the Court degrades the public confidence in both the SSA and the Court. 

This is not a situation where reasonable minds could differ.  This case raises the specter of an easily verifiable concrete fact that is either right or wrong.  Discretion permits an ALJ to have his own conclusions, but not his own facts on which no reasonable person could differ.  In Chaudhry, we have a young man that served the United States, after leaving his native Pakistan, honorably in the military only to have an ALJ's silent speed torpedo his entitlement to disability benefits.  Certainly Chaudhry got his VA benefits and if still insured for disability benefits can get SSDI for future periods.  But that isn't the promise that we as a nation made to our young men and women that served in the armed forces especially an immigrant that probably served against the cultural norm from which he emerged.  What we promised was that if he sustained injury during the course of his military service that he would receive a VA benefit for any compensable disability and if the disability precluded substantial gainful activity that he would receive SSDI to permit him some semblance of a standard of living. 

The Court should get out of the business of excusing bad decisions by the SSA under the guise of permitting a wide range of discretion.  The Court should get into the business of narrowing the range of discretion so that claimants like Chaudhry have their cases determined based on the facts of the case instead of the lottery of the identity of the individual ALJ.  Someone pass a note to the Court -- "there are administrative law judges that make mistakes and the Court is the last protection against gross error."  This case involves the grotesque error of harming our servicemen and women. 

11 comments:

  1. its nice post about the security thanks for providing such useful information actually there should be proper councling about the SIA Training it provides a better security tricks along with to brighten someone's career.....

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Ninth Circuit denied rehearing last month, refusing to resolve the tension between McLeod and Chaudhry.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Disability claims are available for many people, often through their employer's group benefits plan to help cover the loss of wages if the employee has to take time off due to illness or injury. Even though these disability benefits are an integral and valuable part of the employees’ remuneration, filing a disability claim is often denied or delayed, as a means to frustrate the employee to return back to work.

    thanks a lot for sharing
    disability claims

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for sharing your personal experience with us on this topic, your article is quite motivating, and i have bookmarked your site to learn things in future..

    I am in the disability network of employment services which helps unemployed disabled people. I don't see anyone in wheelchairs so I assume everyone else is crazy just like i am.

    Thanks

    Disability Insurance Attorney

    ReplyDelete
  5. So I've been looking for a good social security disability attorney in Cincinnati. I'm just not sure what the best way to do it is. Would you have any suggestions?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes I have used McKennon Law Group for insurance. It is the right place for professional and expert insurance holders. For more details you can refer Bad Faith Insurance Lawyers

    ReplyDelete
  7. Certainly many people have the situation and have the same feeling thoughts towards that kind of process. To Liam, choose the best disability attorney to help you. Good Luck.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Employers who do not give what are rightfully for the employers especially compensation due to disability will find hope with the help of disability attorney.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi there! great stuff, I'm glad that I drop by your page and found these very interesting and informative. Thanks for sharing, keep it up!
    A personal injury occurs when a person has suffered physical or psychological damage or even death due to an accident, negligence or a malicious act on the part of another person. A victim of personal injury is burdened with not only the injury at hand but also the financial problems that may occur due to medical bills and lost wages.

    Attorney Peabody MA

    ReplyDelete
  10. I didn't even know that there was such a thing as a social security disability attorney cincinnati. What situation would it be good to have one?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks for the help. I collect my social security disability in minnesota, and it usually takes longer than my cousin in nebraska

    ReplyDelete

Kosher Inspector - 529.687-126; Coal Sampler - 922.687-038 - Occasional Handling, No Fingering

We used the  SCO and the aptitudes for dexterity  to show that there really are not a significant number of jobs for a person limited to lig...