1. Does
the attorney know the file better than the medical expert in every case?
That requires hours of case review per file and some files exceed 5,000
pages. Did the attorney read and annotate the file before the hearing …
every time?
2. Does
the attorney act like the potted plant at the hearing?
a. Was
there meaningful cross of the medical expert about unfavorable and unsupported
parts of the ME testimony?
b. Was
there meaningful cross of the vocational expert?
3. Does
the attorney have a theory of the case that pertains to the facts of the case?
a. Does
the claimant fit inside of a favorable grid rule?
b. Does
the claimant have a non-exertional impairment that wipes out work at an or
several exertional levels?
c. Does
the attorney ask questions tailored to the theory of the case?
i.
Do you have good use of your hands?
ii.
If no, tell the judge what you mean by “no.”
iii.
Can you open jars with ease? Explain.
iv.
Can you manipulate a zipper with ease?
Explain.
v.
Can you type? How fast? How many
errors? For how long?
vi.
Can you use a mouse? Which hand? For
how long?
vii.
Cooking, scissors, etc.
d. Does
the attorney have record citations that back up the theory of the case?
4. Does
the attorney permit the vocational expert to go unchecked – the potted plant
syndrome?
a. Can
the attorney cross the VE on the provisions of the DOT and its companion
publications including temperaments, aptitudes, environmental requirements,
physical requirements? Does the attorney know the DOT better than the VE?
b. Can
the attorney cross the VE based on the rulings? See POMS DI 25025.030 for a list of the rulings about the significance of
impairments on the exertional bases.
c. Can
the attorney cross the VE based on mental limitations. See POMS DI 25020.010 for a list of the critical and strictly enforced requirements
of unskilled work.
i.
Is a 10% reduction in productivity meaningless
but a 15% reduction preclusive of all work?
ii.
Is superficial contact with supervisors a
limitation that permits a wide swath of work?
iii.
Is working in relative isolation OK?
iv.
What does SSR 00-4p say about testimony
inconsistent with agency policy?
v.
What does SSR 13-2p include in the statements of
agency policy?
d. Does
the attorney have a working knowledge of the scope of administrative
notice? See 404.1566(d) and 416.966(d).
i.
Can the attorney challenge the VE on jobs within
a specific industry? See County Business Patterns.
ii.
Can the attorney challenge the VE on the
educational requirements for work as described in the OOH and the O*NET?
iii.
Does the attorney know the difference between
Current Population Survey and Occupational Employment Statistics?
iv.
Does the attorney know the difference between
SOC, OES, O*NET, and Census code reporting of job numbers? The first
three are the same for our purposes, the last one isn’t?
v.
Does the attorney know how to use the BLS
employment projections?
vi.
Does the attorney know how to cross on a
transferability of skills issue? See POMS DI 25015.017 TSA.
1. GOE
codes
2. MPSMS
codes
3. Work
Fields
4. Occupational
Group
5. Industry
Designation
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete